Acupuncture for Breast Cancer Side Effects - New Study

A new study finds acupuncture effective for the treatment of breast cancer drug treatment side effects. Acupuncture has been tested in many studies for the treatment of drug side effects. The study focuses on acupuncture for the relief of symptoms due to aromatase inhibitor treatment intake. The researchers noted two interesting findings. First, acupuncture is statistically more effective than clonidine for the treatment of hot flashes due to breast cancer treatment. Secondly, statistical differences between sham acupuncture and real acupuncture did not exist in some quality of life measures determined by questionnaires to participants. Oddly, the publication makes no mention of acupuncture needle techniques, types, brands, lengths, gauges, insertion angles and insertion depths.

Real acupuncture produced a mean reduction of 37% for hot flashes. The researchers note that this is superior to the 20% reduction achieved by the pharmaceutical drug clonidine but less than that achieved by paroxetine (45.6%). The researchers note that acupuncture, unlike the medications reviewed, “was not associated with any significant side effects, whereas clonidine and antidepressants were associated with multiple side effects….”

The mean percentage of hot flashes in the sham acupuncture group worsened by 79% whereas the real acupuncture group demonstrated a mean improvement by 37%. However, the researchers do not cite statistical differences between real acupuncture and sham acupuncture. This is because the sham acupuncture scores were worsened, in part, due to 3 sham acupuncture patients whose symptoms worsened significantly. This depressed the sham acupuncture score significantly. Also, assessments for mood, anxiety and other measures showed similarities. As a result, the researchers concluded that both real acupuncture and sham acupuncture demonstrated statistically similar improvements.

Real acupuncture patients did not have severe increases in hot flashes. Sham acupuncture patients did have severe increases. Overall improvements for both groups were significant for specific ailments and without side effects. The researchers note that one major difficulty with this study is that the sample size of participants was small and further investigation is warranted.

A closer look at the data confirms that further investigation is warranted. When sorting for hot flashes in a mean severity score and a mean frequency score, real acupuncture demonstrated marked improvement over sham acupuncture for African-Americans and women under 50 years of age. However, no statistical differences were noted based on body mass index (BMI). Additionally, the researchers note no statistical differences for quality of life scores between real and sham acupuncture although both arms of the study showed significant improvement.

The study randomized patients into real acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups that were observed for 8 weeks. The real acupuncture group received acupuncture at acupoints CV4, CV6, CV12, LI4, P6, GB34, ST36, KI3 and UB65. The sham acupuncture group “received nonpenetrating, retractable needles placed in 14 sham acupoints located at the midpoint of the line connecting 2 real acupoints.”

There is no mention of obtaining deqi, needle type or brand, depth of needle insertion or angle of insertion in the full text of the research paper. This is an unusual omission and one uncommon to many important acupuncture research publications. Absent this data in the official release, further investigation is needed to determine if the real acupuncture group was actually an additional sham group because of acupuncture needling protocol variance.

If the needles were tapped through an auto-insertion tube to an insufficient depth or were applied with an insufficient needle gauge, the real acupuncture group’s clinical efficacy would have been greatly impaired and therefore becomes non-reflective of actual clinical practice by a licensed acupuncturist. As such, the real acupuncture group simulates a theoretical approach to acupuncture inconsistent with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) protocol and has the clinical efficaciousness of a sham acupuncture group. Regardless of the actual techniques employed, the published research lacks transparency and contains conspicuous procedural omissions.

A major concern with this type of study is the acupuncture point prescription chosen for all participants. A standard acupuncture point formulation is applied regardless of individual indications and differential diagnoses in this study. This is not unusual for research but is a weakness of this format. In Traditional Chinese Medicine, this particular set of standard points is not applied in all cases of breast cancer treatment side effects. As a result, the study does not measure the effects of acupuncture as it is administered in a clinical setting. The study measures only the benefits of acupuncture at this set of acupoints using unspecified acupuncture needles and needle techniques.

The research publication lists 7 MDs, 2 CCRPs, 2 BSs, 2 PhDs and 1 licensed acupuncturist as authors. Authors were affiliated with either The University of Maryland Greenbaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland; or the Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Two MDs had published conflict of interest statements. They received compensation as either consultants or for research funding from the pharmaceutical companies Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and/or Merk.

In other research conducted by Yale University in conjunction with the University of Pittsburg, researchers concluded that acupuncture significantly reduces hot flashes for women receiving conventional breast cancer treatments including tamoxifen and hormonal agents. In a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial, the researchers measured a 30% reduction of hot flashes for women receiving acupuncture. In yet another study of 94 women, researchers discovered that acupuncture is effective for the relief of hot flashes and sleep disturbances for women receiving conventional breast cancer treatment. The real acupuncture group showed improvements and the sham acupuncture group did not show improvements.

Source: healthcmi.com

Preventing Illnesses and Diseases with Vitamin C

Have a look at this short Video Clip where Nobel Price Winner LINUS PAULING explains how easy it is to prevent any illnesses with the right amounts of Vitamin C.

To get your pure Vitamin C, check out the link below:
www.activatedmineralsolution.com
If you would like to know how to make money with your passion, click the button below.

Stroke has a new indicator

Stroke has a new indicatorThey say if you email this to ten people, you stand a chance of saving one life. Will you send this along?Blood Clots/Stroke - They Now Have a Fourth Indicator, the Tongue

I will continue to forward this every time it comes around!
STROKE: Remember the 1st Three Letters.....
S. T. R. 
STROKE IDENTIFICATION:


During a BBQ, a woman stumbled and took a little fall - she assured everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) ...she said she had just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes.


They got her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food. While she appeared a bit shaken up, Jane went about enjoying herself the rest of the evening.

Jane's husband called later telling everyone that his wife had been taken to the hospital - (at 6:00 PM Jane passed away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ. Had they known how to identify the signs of a stroke, perhaps Jane would be with us today. Some don't die. They end up in a helpless, hopeless condition instead.


It only takes a minute to read this.

A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed, and then getting the patient medically cared for within 3 hours, which is tough.

RECOGNIZING A STROKE

Thank God for the sense to remember the '3' steps, STR. Read and
Learn!

Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer severe brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke.

Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions:
S *Ask the individual to SMILE.

T *Ask the person to TALK and SPEAK A
SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently)
(i.e. Chicken Soup)

R *Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS.

If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call emergency numberimmediately and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher.


New Sign of a Stroke --------
Stick out Your Tongue!

NOTE: Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out his tongue. If the tongue is
'crooked', if it goes to one side or the otherthat is also an indication of a stroke.

A cardiologist says if everyone who gets this e-mail sends it to 10 people; you can bet that at least one life will be saved.

I have done my part. Will you?

Source: evernote.com

Amazing Cancer Killer - Vitamin B17 (Laetrile)

 Have you ever watched the amazing documentary "A World without Cancer" by G. Edward Griffin ?

It shows you the Amazing Cancer Killer - Vitamin B17 (Laetrile)

When the Laetrile compound molecule that is rich in Apricot Kernels, comes across a cancer cell, it is broken down into 2 molecules of glucose, 1 molecule of hydrogen cyanide and 1 molecule of benzaldehyde. In the early days of laetrile research it was assumed that the hydrogen cyanide molecule was the major cancer cell killing molecule, but now it is known that it is the benzaldehyde molecule that is by far the major reason the cancer cell is killed.

Interested in some Apricot Kernels to treat or prevent Cancer?... get them here: www.apricotpower.com

Here the Documentary "A World without Cancer"

DMSO: Many Uses, Much Controversy

Abstract

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), a by-product of the wood industry, has been in use as a commercial solvent since 1953. It is also one of the most studied but least understood pharmaceutical agents of our time--at least in the United States. According to Stanley Jacob, MD, a former head of the organ transplant program at Oregon Health Sciences University in Portland, more than 40,000 articles on its chemistry have appeared in scientific journals, which, in conjunction with thousands of laboratory studies, provide strong evidence of a wide variety of properties. (See Major Properties Attributed to DMSO) Worldwide, some 11,000 articles have been written on its medical and clinical implications, and in 125 countries throughout the world, including Canada, Great Britain, Germany, and Japan, doctors prescribe it for a variety of ailments, including pain, inflammation, scleroderma, interstitial cystitis, and arthritis elevated intercranial pressure.

Yet in the United States, DMSO has Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval only for use as a preservative of organs for transplant and for interstitial cystitis, a bladder disease. It has fallen out of the limelight and out of the mainstream of medical discourse, leading some to believe that it was discredited. The truth is more complicated.

DMSO: A History of Controversy

The history of DMSO as a pharmaceutical began in 1961, when Dr. Jacob was head of the organ transplant program at Oregon Health Sciences University. It all started when he first picked up a bottle of the colorless liquid. While investigating its potential as a preservative for organs, he quickly discovered that it penetrated the skin quickly and deeply without damaging it. He was intrigued. Thus began his lifelong investigation of the drug.

The news media soon got word of his discovery, and it was not long before reporters, the pharmaceutical industry, and patients with a variety of medical complaints jumped on the news. Because it was available for industrial uses, patients could dose themselves. This early public interest interfered with the ability of Dr. Jacob--or, later, the FDA--to see that experimentation and use were safe and controlled and may have contributed to the souring of the mainstream medical community on it.

Why, if DMSO possesses half the capabilities claimed by Dr. Jacob and others, is it still on the sidelines of medicine in the United States today?

"It's a square peg being pushed into a round hole," says Dr. Jacob. "It doesn't follow the rifle approach of one agent against one disease entity. It's the aspirin of our era. If aspirin were to come along today, it would have the same problem. If someone gave you a little white pill and said take this and your headache will go away, your body temperature will go down, it will help prevent strokes and major heart problems--what would you think?"

Others cite DMSO's principal side effect: an odd odor, akin to that of garlic, that emanates from the mouth shortly after use, even if use is through the skin. Certainly, this odor has made double-blinded studies difficult. Such studies are based on the premise that no one, neither doctor nor patient, knows which patient receives the drug and which the placebo, but this drug announces its presence within minutes.

Others, such as Terry Bristol, a Ph.D. candidate from the University of London and president of the Institute for Science, Engineering and Public Policy in Portland, Oregon, who assisted Dr. Jacob with his research in the 1960s and 1970s, believe that the smell of DMSO may also have put off the drug companies, that feared it would be hard to market. Worse, however, for the pharmaceutical companies was the fact that no company could acquire an exclusive patent for DMSO, a major consideration when the clinical testing required to win FDA approval for a drug routinely runs into millions of dollars. In addition, says Mr. Bristol, DMSO, with its wide range of attributes, would compete with many drugs these companies already have on the market or in development.

The FDA and DMSO

In the first flush of enthusiasm over the drug, six pharmaceutical companies embarked on clinical studies. Then, in November 1965, a woman in Ireland died of an allergic reaction after taking DMSO and several other drugs. Although the precise cause of the woman's death was never determined, the press reported it to be DMSO. Two months later, the FDA closed down clinical trials in the United States, citing the woman's death and changes in the lenses of certain laboratory animals that had been given doses of the drug many times higher than would be given humans.

Some 20 years and hundreds of laboratory and human studies later, no other deaths have been reported, nor have changes in the eyes of humans been documented or claimed. Since then, however, the FDA has refused seven applications to conduct clinical studies, and approved only 1, for intersititial cystitis, which subsequently was approved for prescriptive use in 1978.

Dr. Jacob believes the FDA "blackballed" DMSO, actively trying to kill interest in a drug that could end much suffering. Jack de la Torre, MD, Ph.D., professor of neurosurgery and physiology at the University of New Mexico Medical School in Albuquerque, a pioneer in the use of DMSO and closed head injury, says, "Years ago the FDA had a sort of chip on its shoulder because it thought DMSO was some kind of snake oil medicine. There were people there who were openly biased against the compound even though they knew very little about it. With the new administration at that agency, it has changed a bit." The FDA recently granted permission to conduct clinical trials in Dr. de la Torre's field of closed head injury.

DMSO Penetrates Membranes and Eases Pain

The first quality that struck Dr. Jacob about the drug was its ability to pass through membranes, an ability that has been verified by numerous subsequent researchers.1 DMSO's ability to do this varies proportionally with its strength--up to a 90 percent solution. From 70 percent to 90 percent has been found to be the most effective strength across the skin, and, oddly, performance drops with concentrations higher than 90 percent. Lower concentrations are sufficient to cross other membranes. Thus, 15 percent DMSO will easily penetrate the bladder.2

In addition, DMSO can carry other drugs with it across membranes. It is more successful ferrying some drugs, such as morphine sulfate, penicillin, steroids, and cortisone, than others, such as insulin. What it will carry depends on the molecular weight, shape, and electrochemistry of the molecules. This property would enable DMSO to act as a new drug delivery system that would lower the risk of infection occurring whenever skin is penetrated.

DMSO perhaps has been used most widely as a topical analgesic, in a 70 percent DMSO, 30 percent water solution. Laboratory studies suggest that DMSO cuts pain by blocking peripheral nerve C fibers.3 Several clinical trials have demonstrated its effectiveness,4,5 although in one trial, no benefit was found.6 Burns, cuts, and sprains have been treated with DMSO. Relief is reported to be almost immediate, lasting up to 6 hours. A number of sports teams and Olympic athletes have used DMSO, although some have since moved on to other treatment modalities. When administration ceases, so do the effects of the drug.

Dr. Jacob said at a hearing of the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Health in 1980, "DMSO is one of the few agents in which effectiveness can be demonstrated before the eyes of the observers....If we have patients appear before the Committee with edematous sprained ankles, the application of DMSO would be followed by objective diminution of swelling within an hour. No other therapeutic modality will do this."

Chronic pain patients often have to apply the substance for 6 weeks before a change occurs, but many report relief to a degree they had not been able to obtain from any other source.

DMSO and Inflammation

DMSO reduces inflammation by several mechanisms. It is an antioxidant, a scavenger of the free radicals that gather at the site of injury. This capability has been observed in experiments with laboratory animals7 and in 150 ulcerative colitis patients in a double-blinded randomized study in Baghdad, Iraq.8 DMSO also stabilizes membranes and slows or stops leakage from injured cells.

At the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1978, 213 patients with inflammatory genitourinary disorders were studied. Researchers concluded that DMSO brought significant relief to the majority of patients. They recommended the drug for all inflammatory conditions not caused by infection or tumor in which symptoms were severe or patients failed to respond to conventional therapy.9

Stephen Edelson, MD, F.A.A.F.P., F.A.A.E.M., who practices medicine at the Environmental and Preventive Health Center of Atlanta, has used DMSO extensively for 4 years. "We use it intravenously as well as locally," he says. "We use it for all sorts of inflammatory conditions, from people with rheumatoid arthritis to people with chronic low back inflammatory-type symptoms, silicon immune toxicity syndromes, any kind of autoimmune process.

"DMSO is not a cure," he continues. "It is a symptomatic approach used while you try to figure out why the individual has the process going on. When patients come in with rheumatoid arthritis, we put them on IV DMSO, maybe three times a week, while we are evaluating the causes of the disease, and it is amazing how free they get. It really is a dramatic treatment."

As for side effects, Dr. Edelson says: "Occasionally, a patient will develop a headache from it, when used intravenously--and it is dose related." He continues: "If you give a large dose, [the patient] will get a headache. And we use large doses. I have used as much as 30ÝmlÝIV over a couple of hours. The odor is a problem. Some men have to move out of the room [shared] with their wives and into separate bedrooms. That is basically the only problem."

DMSO was the first nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory discovered since aspirin. Mr. Bristol believes that it was that discovery that spurred pharmaceutical companies on to the development on other varieties of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories. "Pharmaceutical companies were saying that if DMSO can do this, so can other compounds," says Mr. Bristol. "The shame is that DMSO is less toxic and has less int he way of side effects than any of them."

Collagen and Scleroderma

Scleroderma is a rare, disabling, and sometimes fatal disease, resulting form an abnormal buildup of collagen in the body. The body swells, the skin--particularly on hands and face--becomes dense and leathery, and calcium deposits in joints cause difficulty of movement. Fatigue and difficulty in breathing may ensue. Amputation of affected digits may be necessary. The cause of scleroderma is unknown, and, until DMSO arrived, there was no known effective treatment.

Arthur Scherbel, MD, of the department of rheumatic diseases and pathology at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, conducted a study using DMSO with 42 scleroderma patients who had already exhausted all other possible therapies without relief. Dr. Scherbel and his coworkers concluded 26 of the 42 showed good or excellent improvement. Histotoxic changes were observed together with healing of ischemic ulcers on fingertips, relief from pain and stiffness, and an increase in strength. The investigators noted, "It should be emphasized that these have never been observed with any other mode of therapy."10 Researchers in other studies have since come to similar conclusions.11

Does DMSO Help Arthritis?

It was inevitable that DMSO, with its pain-relieving, collagen-softening, and anti-inflammatory characteristics, would be employed against arthritis, and its use has been linked to arthritis as much as to any condition. Yet the FDA has never given approval for this indication and has, in fact, turned down three Investigational New Drug (IND) applications to conduct extensive clinical trials.

Moreover, its use for arthritis remains controversial. Robert Bennett, MD, F.R.C.P., F.A.C.R., F.A.C.P., professor of medicine and chief, division of arthritis and rheumatic disease at Oregon Health Sciences University (Dr. Jacob's university), says other drugs work better. Dava Sobel and Arthur Klein conducted their own informal study of 47 arthritis patients using DMSO in preparation for writing their book, Arthritis: What Works, and came to the same conclusion.12

Yet laboratory studies have indicated that DMSO's capacity as a free-radical scavenger suggests an important role for it in arthritis.13 The Committee of Clinical Drug Trials of the Japanese Rheumatism Association conducted a trial with 318 patients at several clinics using 90 percent DMSO and concluded that DMSO relieved joint pain and increased range of joint motion and grip strength, although performing better in more recent cases of the disease.14 It is employed widely in the former Soviet Union for all the different types of arthritis, as it is in other countries around the world.

Dr. Jacob remains convinced that it can play a significant role in the treatment of arthritis. "You talk to veterinarians associated with any race track, and you'll find there's hardly an animal there that hasn't been treated with DMSO. No veterinarian is going to give his patient something that does not work. There's no placebo effect on a horse."

DMSO and Central Nervous System Trauma

Since 1971, Dr. de la Torre, then at the University of Chicago, has experimented using DMSO with injury to the central nervous system. Working with laboratory animals, he discovered that DMSO lowered intracranial pressure faster and more effectively than any other drug. DMSO also stabilized blood pressure, improved respiration, and increased urine output by five times and increased blood flow through the spinal cord to areas of injury.15-17 Since then, DMSO has been employed with human patients suffering severe head trauma, initially those whose intracranial pressure remained high despite the administration of mannitol, steroids, and barbiturates. In humans, as well as animals, it has proven the first drug to significantly lower intracranial pressure, the number one problem with severe head trauma.

"We believe that DMSO may be a very good product for stroke," says Dr. de la Torre, "and that is a devastating illness which affects many more people than head injury. We have done some preliminary clinical trials, and there's a lot of animal data showing that it is a very good agent in dissolving clots."

Other Possible Applications for DMSO

Many other uses for DMSO have been hypothesized from its known qualities hand have been tested in the laboratory or in small clinical trials. Mr. Bristol speaks with frustration about important findings that have never been followed up on because of the difficulty in finding funding and because "to have on your resume these days that you've worked on DMSO is the kiss of death." It is simply too controversial. A sampling of some other possible applications for this drug follows.

DMSO as long been used to promote healing. People who have it on hand often use it for minor cuts and burns and report that recovery is speedy. Several studies have documented DMSO use with soft tissue damage, local tissue death, skin ulcers, and burns.18-21

In relation to cancer, several properties of DMSO have gained attention. In one study with rats, DMSO was found to delay the spread of one cancer and prolong survival rates with another.22 In other studies, it has been found to protect noncancer cells while potentiating the chemotherapeutic agent.

Much has been written recently about the worldwide crisis in antibiotic resistance among bacteria (see Alternative & Complementary Therapies, Volume 2, Number 3, 1996, pages 140-144) Here, too, DMSO may be able to play a role. Researcher as early as 1975 discovered that it could break down the resistance certain bacteria have developed.23

In addition to its ability to lower intracranial pressure following closed head injury, Dr. de la Torre's work suggests that the drug may actually have the ability to prevent paralysis, given its ability to speedily clean out cellular debris and stop the inflammation that prevents blood from reaching muscle, leading to the death of muscle tissue.

With its great antioxidant powers, DMSO could be used to mitigate some of the effects of aging, but little work has been done to investigate this possibility. Toxic shock, radiation sickness, and septicemia have all been postulated as responsive to DMSO, as have other conditions too numerous to mention here.

DMSO in the Future

Will DMSO ever sit on the shelves of pharmacies in this country as a legal prescriptive for many of the conditions it may be able to address? Will the studies we need to discover when this drug is most appropriate ever be done? Given the difficulties the drug has run into so far and the recent development of new drugs that perform some of the same functions, Mr. Bristol is doubtful. Others, however, such as Dr. Jacob and Dr. de la Torre, see the FDA approval of DMSO for interstitial cystitis and the more recent FDA go-ahead for DMSO trials with closed head injury as new indications of hope. The cystitis approval means that physicians may use it at their discretion for other uses, giving DMSO a new legitimacy.

Dr. Jacob continues to believe that DMSO should not even be called a drug but is more correctly a new therapeutic principle, with an effect on medicine that will be profound in many areas. Whether that is true cannot be known without extensive a publicly reported trials, which are dependent on the willingness of researchers to undertake rigorous studies in this still-unfashionable tack and of pharmaceutical companies and other investors to back them up. That this is a live issue is proved by the difficulty the investigators with approval to test DMSO for closed head injury clinically are having finding funds to conduct the trials.

In 1980, testifying before the Select Committee on Agin of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dr. Scherbel said, "The controversy that exists over the clinical effectiveness of DMSO is not well-founded--clinical effectiveness may be variable in different patients. If toxicity is consistently minimal, the drug should not be restricted from practice. The clinical effectiveness of DMSO can be decided with complete satisfaction if the drug is made available to the practicing physician. The number of patient complaints about pain and the number of phone calls to the doctor's office will decide quickly whether or not the drug is effective."

It may be premature to call for the full rehabilitation of DMSO, but it is time to call for a full investigation of its true range of capabilities. 

Source: www.dmso.org/ 

DMSO and Vitamin C - The Magic Duo for Cancer Treatment That Frightens The FDA and Conventional Medicine

Use of DMSO in medicine dates back decades. It was predominantly used as a topical analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant. Today, we know that DMSO can treat a variety of disorders including arthritis, mental illness, emphysema, and even cancer. While this is now considered a superb cancer treatment, orthodox medicine is not interested in discussing its benefits. If DMSO were to be implemented and used in cancer treatment, the "true cure rate" for orthodox medicine would rise from 3% to above 90%! Here's why.

Supporters of DMSO have long supported the claim that it can cause cancerous cells to become noncancerous, or benign, and can slow or stop the progress of cancer in the bladder, colon, ovary, breast, and skin. Some evidence even suggests it is useful in treating leukemia, and it has also been used as a part of some metabolic cancer therapies.

DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) was first discovered in the mid- to late nineteenth century. In the 1950s, it was discovered that DMSO could protect cells from the damage of freezing. In the 1960s, Dr. Stanley Jacob, one of the main proponents of DMSO, began to study other medicinal properties of the substance. In the 1970s, DMSO was approved for use as an anti-inflammatory treatment in dogs and horses and as a prescription drug for a type of bladder inflammation in humans.

If orthodox medicine were truly interested in curing cancer, don't you think they would look for a way to target cancer cells with the intent of killing them while sparing normal cells?
Chemotherapy does not target cancer cells, and because of this, chemotherapy:
1) Kills far more normal cells than cancer cells, and
2) Damages and toxifies many of the normal cells that do survive.

If a "magic bullet" were used FIRST by orthodox medicine, meaning the Cut/burn/slash/poison treatments were avoided,  a 90% true cure rate would be easy to achieve. But the fact of the matter is that the leaders in the medical community have absolutely no interest in finding a "magic bullet." A "magic bullet" would cost the drug companies hundreds of billions of dollars, patients would have less hospitalization, less doctor visits, etc. The fact is, no one wants a "magic bullet" to be found. The evidence that this is true is that two "magic bullets" are already known to exist, but no one is using them except for a handful of doctors.

What Causes Cancer?
Most people believe that it is DNA damage that causes cancer. While in rare situations, DNA can have a negative affect on a person's immune system, DNA normally has absolutely nothing to do with the development of cancer.
The fact is that cancer is caused by a special type of microbe which gets inside of normal cells and turns the cells cancerous.

Cancer is an invading disease that attacks the body’s immune system. Once detected, cancer has already had enough time to establish its web network. Treating the tumor is not good enough--it is only the start.
Actually, everyone has cancer cells forming in their body at all times. The immune system generally safely kills them. However, this means that a weakened immune system, and many other things, can allow cancer cells to overcome the immune system. But the actual formation of cancer cells is exclusively caused by microbes which get inside of normal cells.

Dr. Royal Rife did an enormous amount of research into the relationship between microbes and cancer in the 1930s. He would inject mice with a virus and in 100% of the cases the mice would get cancer.
Dr. Rife proposed a cure for cancer which did nothing but kill the viruses/microbes which were inside of the cancer cells. His cure was 100% successful. However, note that his cure had no intention of killing cancer cells or fixing DNA (which had not been discovered in the 1930s); its only goal was to kill microbes which were both inside and outside of the cancer cells. Once the microbes were dead the cancer cells were able to revert back into normal, differentiated cells.
Dr. Rife was well aware that the critial microbes which needed to be killed were inside the cancer cells. The electromedicine device he used killed microbes inside and outside of cancer cells.

But almost all natural substances do not normally get inside of cells, thus it is almost impossible for natural substances to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells. Natural substances can kill cancer cells and build the immune system, but they generally cannot kill microbes inside the cancer cells.

There is no single cure for treating cancer; cancer must be approached and treated holistically. The cellular process in developing cancer takes many years--with the exception of high radiation or other toxic exposure, a compromised immunity and cell damage does not happen overnight. Treatment must be approached defensively and directly; focus on the cause and do not treat cancer in reverse. Target your treatment mentally and physically from the very origin.
DMSO
You might ask your oncologist why your chances of survival are only 3% (ignoring all of their statistical gibberish such as "5-year survival rates" and deceptive terms like "remission" and "response"), when your chance of survival would be over 90% if they used DMSO.

It would be better for medical doctors to treat cancer patients with the right treatment than to have patients treat themselves at home. Medical doctors can diagnose better, treat better, watch for developing problems better, etc. Unfortunately, doctors are using treatments that have been chosen solely on the basis of their profitability rather than their effectiveness.
DMSO is a highly non-toxic, 100% natural product that comes from the wood industry. But of course, like so many other potential cancer cures, the discovery was buried. DMSO, being a natural product, cannot be patented and cannot be made profitable because it is produced by the ton in the wood industry. The only side-effect of using DMSO in humans is body odor (which varies from patient to patient).

The FDA took note of the effectiveness of DMSO at treating pain and made it illegal for medical uses in order to protect the profits of the aspirin companies (in those days aspirin was used to treat arthritis). Thus, it must be sold today as a "solvent." Few people can grasp the concept that government agencies are organized for the sole purpose of being the "police force" of large, corrupt corporations.

While it is generally believed that orthodox medicine and modern corrupt politicians persecute alternative medicine, this is not technically correct. What they do is persecute ANY cure for cancer, it doesn't matter whether it is orthodox or alternative. The proof of this is DMSO. It appears that orthodox medicine persecutes alternative medicine only because there are far more alternative cancer treatments that can cure cancer than orthodox treatments.

Another substance that targets cancer cells is being researched at Purdue University and other places: folic acid. This too will be buried unless it can lead to more profitable cancer treatments.

But alternative medicine is rightfully not interested in combining DMSO with chemotherapy. DMSO will combine with many substances, grab them, and drag them into cancer cells. It will also blast through the blood-brain barrier like it wasn't even there.

DMSO has been combined successfully with hydrogen peroxide (e.g. see Donsbach), cesium chloride, MSM (though it may not bind to MSM), and other products.

DMSO - Vitamin C Treatment

Vitamin C is so simlar to glucose, that cells, and especially cancer cells, consume vitamin C the same way they would consume glucose.

Cancer cells are anaerobic obligates, which means they depend upon glucose as their primary source of metabolic fuel. Cancer cells employ transport mechanisms called glucose transporters to actively pull in glucose.

In the vast majority of animals, vitamin C is synthesized from glucose in only four metabolic steps. Hence, the molecular shape of vitamin C is remarkably similar to glucose. Cancer cells will actively transport vitamin C into themselves, possibly because they mistake it for glucose. Another plausible explanation is that they are using the vitamin C as an antioxidant. Regardless, the vitamin C accumulates in cancer cells.

If large amounts of vitamin C are presented to cancer cells, large amounts will be absorbed. In these unusually large concentrations, the antioxidant vitamin C will start behaving as a pro-oxidant as it interacts with intracellular copper and iron. This chemical interaction produces small amounts of hydrogen peroxide.

Because cancer cells are relatively low in an intracellular anti-oxidant enzyme called catalase, the high dose vitamin C induction of peroxide will continue to build up until it eventually lyses the cancer cell from the inside out! This effectively makes high dose IVC a non-toxic chemotherapeutic agent that can be given in conjunction with conventional cancer treatments. Based on the work of several vitamin C pioneers before him, Dr. Riordan was able to prove that vitamin C was selectively toxic to cancer cells if given intravenously. This research was recently reproduced and published by Dr. Mark Levine at the National Institutes of Health.

As feared by many oncologists, small doses may actually help the cancer cells because small amounts of vitamin C may help the cancer cells arm themselves against the free-radical induced damage caused by chemotherapy and radiation. Only markedly higher doses of vitamin C will selectively build up as peroxide in the cancer cells to the point of acting in a manner similar to chemotherapy. These tumor-toxic dosages can only be obtained by intravenous administration.

Over a span of 15 years of vitamin C research, Dr. Riordan's RECNAC (cancer spelled backwards) research team generated 20 published papers on vitamin C and cancer. RECNAC even inspired its second cancer research institute, known as RECNAC II, at the University of Puerto Rico. This group recently published an excellent paper in Integrative Cancer Therapies, titled "Orthomolecular Oncology Review: Ascorbic Acid and Cancer 25 Years Later." RECNAC data has shown that vitamin C is toxic to tumor cells without sacrificing the performance of chemotherapy.

Intravenous vitamin C also does more than just kill cancer cells. It boosts immunity. It can stimulate collagen formation to help the body wall off the tumor. It inhibits hyaluronidase, an enzyme that tumors use to metastasize and invade other organs throughout the body. It induces apoptosis to help program cancer cells into dying early. It corrects the almost universal scurvy in cancer patients. Cancer patients are tired, listless, bruise easily, and have a poor appetite. They don't sleep well and have a low threshold for pain. This adds up to a very classic picture of scurvy that generally goes unrecognized by their conventional physicians.

Because cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than normal cells, under the right conditions, cancer cells should consume 15 times more vitamin C than a normal cell. While normal cells benefit from vitamin C, the microbes inside of the cancer cells may be killed by vitamin C. It is microbes which are inside of the cancer cells which cause cancer and which force a cancer cell to remain cancerous.
It should be mentioned that two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, and an associate, Dr. Ewan Cameron, M.D., were able to extend the lives of cancer patients more than 10-fold using only 10 grams of vitamin C a day by I.V.
This protocol will modify the Pauling/Cameron protocol four different ways:
1) It will include DMSO in the evening dose to help Vitamin C target cancer cells and get inside of cancer cells,
2) It includes a very, very low glucose diet so that the cancer cells will feast on Vitamin C instead of glucose,
3) It includes 15% or less potassium ascorbate, which has a special affinity for cancer cells,
4) It will include as little sodium ascorbate (or other sodium forms of Vitamin C) as possible because these types of Vitamin C do not get inside of cancer cells very well.
Regarding the use of potassium ascorbate, a foundation in Italy has proven that potassium ascorbate can be used to cure cancer (WARNING: no more than 15% of the Vitmain C you take should be a potassium version!!). See: Pantellini Foundation (Italy)
WARNING: Do NOT use potassium ascorbate or any other form of potassium as your primary source of Vitamin C!!! If you use potassium ascorbate work with the vendor of this product to insure you are taking safe doses relative to non-potassium forms of Vitamin C!!! If your vendor does not make a recommendation, then use 15% as the maximum portion of Vitamin C that is a potassium form!!
The second thing this treatment uses is DMSO. DMSO is used to "open" the ports on the cancer cells to assist getting vitamin C inside the cancer cells. DMSO is very well known to target cancer cells and open their ports. To better understand this concept see this article.
In summary, there are three things that help get the vitamin C inside the cancer cells:
1) Cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than normal cells and cancer cells cannot tell the difference between glucose and vitamin C.
2) The use of potassium ascorbate as a part of the Vitamin C protocol.
3) The use of DMSO.
A fourth unique thing about this protocol is the "cancer diet." The cancer diet for this treatment focuses on a LOW GLUCOSE cancer diet. In this way, the cancer cells have less glucose to interfere with their consumption of vitamin C!

Possible Swelling and Inflammation
There are two possible results when large amounts of vitamin C get inside of a cancer cell. First, the vitamin C can kill the microbe(s) inside the cancer cell and the cell will safely revert into a normal cell; or second, the vitamin C can kill the cancer cell itself.

While the first of these two options will not cause any swelling or inflammation, the second option may cause swelling and inflammation.
For this reason, anyone on this protocol who would be put at risk by swelling and/or inflammation (e.g. in a tumor), should carefully and slowly build-up to the theraputic dose of vitamin C, watching carefully for any potential swelling or inflammation.
Details of the Treatment

Many people have difficulties working with DMSO. In some cases, when taken transdermally (through the skin) there is a skin rash which is simply too severe to continue the treatment. When you get your bottle of DMSO put one drop on your skin, spread it around a little bit and see if you have an allergic reaction (i.e. severe rash). If not, an hour later put 10 drops on your skin and spread it thin.

If you do have a reaction, you may still be able to take the DMSO orally (added to 4 ounces of water). But if you cannot take the DMSO orally, and you have a skin reaction to the DMSO, you will have to abandon this treatment.

If you want to know more about DMSO, see this website:
http://www.dmso.org/articles/information/muir.htm

The Importance of the DMSO

This treatment uses DMSO (in the evening) and vitamin C (twice a day). The theory of this treatment is that the DMSO will be used first (in the evening dose), either taken orally (with water) or transdermally (through the skin). In about 10 minutes the DMSO will have targeted the cancer cells and will start "opening up" their ports.

In the evening dose, about ten minutes after taking the DMSO, the vitamin C will be taken with water. When the vitamin C gets to the cancer cells the cells natural affinity for consuming vitamin C (because the cancer cells "think" the vitamin C is glucose) should be enhanced by the fact that the cancer cells have been "opened up" by DMSO.

The theory is that the DMSO will allow a larger concentration of vitamin C to get inside the cancer cells than would normally occur.

As already mentioned, once vitamin C can get inside of a cancer cell the cell may revert into a normal cell or it may be killed. If enough cancer cells are killed, some swelling may occur.

The Vitamin C To Be Used **VERY Important**

There are several different types of vitamin C. The most common type of vitmain C is ascorbic acid, which is not bound to a mineral. This type of vitamin C is largely useless until it has bound to minerals already in the body.
The ideal vitamin C product will have both ascorbic acid, no more than 15% potassium ascorbate or potassium carbonate and other forms of mineral ascorbates or carbonates or other forms of Vitamin C.

Since sodium is generally found outside of cells and potassium is generally found inside of cells, to get vitamin C inside of cells it is best to use a potassium ascorbate. However, for safety reasons, most of the Vitamin C cannot be a potassium version of Vitamin C (talk to your vendor). If you can avoid sodium ascorbate and use some other non-potassium form of Vitamin C (e.g. ascorbic acid) use it.

Some buffered vitamin C products have ascorbic acid and several different kinds of mineral ascorbates or carbonates (e.g. zinc carbonate). This is good, but it may be necessary to add some potassium ascorbate to get the percentage of potassium up to 15% (or whatever maximum your potassium vendor tells you). Include as little sodium ascorbate as possible.
The DMSO and Vitamin C Protocol
This treatment will be taken twice a day.
The morning dose will only include Vitamin C. Remember to take VERY LITTLE glucose during this treatment!!
The evening treatment will include two phases.

In the evening, Phase One will be 1 TEAspoon of DMSO, taken orally or transdermally or some combination thereof.

Phase Two of the evening dose should follow Phase One by 10 minutes and will consist of 5 grams of vitamin C taken orally in water.

The Morning Dose - Vitamin C Only

The morning dose, which should be taken about twelve hours before the evening dose, should contain 5 grams of vitamin C. Fifteen percent or less (or whatever your potassium vendor tells you) should be a form of potassium carbonate (or some other potassium version of Vitamin C). The other eighty-five percent should contain zero potassium Vitamin C and as little sodium Vitamin C as possible.

The Evening Dose (DMSO and Vitamin C): Phase One: Taking the DMSO

The DMSO used in this protocol should be at least 99% pure DMSO mixed with 30% water. In other words, you should buy "70/30" DMSO, which means 70% pure DMSO and 30% water. Some DMSO vendors sell DMSO Gel or DMSO Liquid
BILD VON DER DMSO FLASCHE mit LINK zu unserem DMSO

The amount of DMSO taken during this treatment is so low that normally it can be taken orally if it is mixed with 4 ounces of water. However, if for any reason the DMSO cannot be taken orally it can be spread over the skin (such as the arms, legs or stomach) and taken transdermally (through the skin).
The DMSO should be put in a glass of water before taking it orally. The glass of water should have at least 4 ounces of water in it!
The Evening Dose:

1a DMSO Orally) If you are taking the DMSO orally, put 4 ounces of a quality bottled water in a glass. Then put ONE TEAspoon of DMSO in the water. Drink the water (and thus the DMSO).
Because the DMSO may cause stomach irritation, you may want to build up to the theraputic dose of DMSO. For example, you might use the following build-up:
Day 1 - Evening) Use 1/4 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 2 - Evening) Use 1/2 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 3 - Evening) Use 3/4 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 4 - Evening) Use 1 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 5 - Evening) Continue using the 1 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water.
1b - DMSO Transdermally) If you are taking the DMSO transdermally (through the skin), put ONE TEAspoon of DMSO on your arms, legs or stomach (as close to the cancer as possible). Spread the DMSO very thin (i.e. over a wide area of skin). Ten minutes after spreading the DMSO on the skin, and AFTER the DMSO has penetrated the skin (and the skin is dry), you can put a skin cream on where you rubbed the DMSO to prevent a rash.

The Evening Dose: Phase Two: Taking the Vitamin C

The evening dose, which should be taken about ten minutes after taking the DMSO, should contain 5 grams of vitamin C. Fifteen percent or less (or whatever your potassium vendor tells you) should be a form of potassium carbonate (or some other potassium version of Vitamin C). The other eighty-five percent should contain no potassium Vitamin C and as little sodium Vitamin C as possible. (Of course, the vitamin C may be pre-mixed).
Here is one highly recommended potassium vitamin C vendor (Fifteen percent or LESS of the Vitamin C should be a potassium version unless your vendor of potassium ascorbate tells you differently):
Excellent Buffered Vitamin C Product
One rounded teaspoon contains 4 grams of absorbic acid and 700 mg of potassium ascorbate. It also has zero mg of sodium (which is ideal). The ideal product will have potassium ascorbate without sodium ascorbate, but with other forms of Vitamin C.

As with all vitamin C products, keep this product out of the reach of children! It can be very dangerous if very high doses are taken.
If you have a type of cancer which could lead to a dangerous situation if swelling and inflammation resulted from this treatment, SLOWLY build up the dose of Vitamin C.

For example, you might use the following build-up (for both morning and evening):
Day 1) Use 1/4 TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 2) Use 1/2 TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 3) Use 3/4 TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 4) Use 1 level TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 5) Start the full treatment at full doses

If you experience any potentially dangerous swelling or inflammation during any of the days, DISCONTINUE THIS TREATMENT.

The Cancer Diet

Any time you use a protocol which is designed to kill microbes it is very, very critical to avoid eating foods and drinks which feed or excite the microbes. This includes cancer because cancer is a microbial disease.
An acidic diet of foods and drinks will make this protocol less effective because microbes will breed much faster and be more aggressive in the presence of an acidic diet. In other words, the microbes will breed faster than you can kill them!! This includes the microbes which are inside the cancer cells.

What this means is that without a solid "cancer diet" there is no way this cancer protocol, or any other cancer protocol, is going to be effective!! The "cancer diet" is also the number one way to stop the spreading of cancer!!
An alkaline diet includes, among other things:
1) ZERO sugar,
2) ZERO white flour,
3) ZERO soda pops (even diet soda pops are forbidden),
4) ZERO meat,
5) ZERO dairy products (except cottage cheese during the Budwig Diet)
After eliminating all the foods that feed or excite microbes, what is left over is basically whole foods, non-sugar fruit and vegetable drinks and other healthy foods and drinks.

Also, for this protocol, pay extra attention to avoiding anything with sugar, glucose, etc. in it (you do not have to worry about whole foods).

Remember this is not only an alkaline diet but also a low-glucose diet.
See this article (you may need to modify this diet to avoid glucose not in whole foods): Cancer Diet article
Other Comments About the Protocol

Starting 45 minutes before taking either the morning or evening treatment, until 45 minutes after taking the vitamin C, you should not eat any foods or take any other supplements. The reason is that the DMSO will open-up the cancer cells and the vitamin C should have as little competition as possible to get inside the cancer cells.

In taking the evening treatment the DMSO is taken first, and the vitamin C is taken 10 minutes AFTER the DMSO is taken.

Thus, the MORNING schedule may look like this:
0800 - 5 grams of vitamin C mixed in 6 ounces of water (with 15% or less a potassium Vitamin C)

2000 (8 PM) - 1 TEAspoon of DMSO, mixed in 4 ounces of water
2010 (8:10 PM) - 5 grams of vitamin C in 6 or more ounces of water

NOTICE: The evening dose, because of the DMSO, will likely create severe body odor. One hour after taking the DMSO the person should take a shower and change clothes and underware. In the morning they should take another shower and change their underware again. For some people even these precautions will not be enough. Have trusted people (WHO HAVE NOT TAKEN DMSO) be the judge of how bad you smell after the two showers and two changes of clothes and underware.
How Long Should the Treatment Be Taken?
This treatment should be taken indefinitely. Every six weeks the patient should take the Navarro Urine test
If the Navarro Urine test number does not increase each time it is taken, continue with this treatment.

If the Navarro Urine test number increases, discontinue this treatment and use a more proven alternative cancer treatment, such as the Cellect-Budwig protocol or the Life One protocol of Dr. Howenstine.

Then, 6 or 8 weeks AFTER the treatment is finished, please take another Navarro urine test. Because the Navarro urine test measures the amount of HCG molecules in your body, even if the cancer is cured, and the cancer cells are removed, the score many not drop as much as it should because it can take several months for the body to flush HCG molecules out of the body, even after the cancer is cured.
What this means is that it is difficult, even using the Navarro, to measure the success of this treatment because there is no way to actually measure how many cancer cells there are in a patient's body without using a PET scan or CT scan.
Contact The Independent Cancer Research Foundation (ICRF) for more information on this protocol, whether you have questions or comments or need to state a protocol, email support is provided.

Source: preventdisease.com/

The world’s oldest lung cancer survivor, who eradicated the disease naturally

Meet the world’s oldest lung cancer survivor, who eradicated the disease naturally—no drugs or treatment.

This July, Dr. Carl Helvie, RN, DrPH., celebrated his 80th birthday. The occasion would be a landmark birthday for any individual, but for Dr. Helvie, who was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer forty years ago and given only 6 months to live, it was particularly poignant. Astoundingly, he eradicated the disease naturally—without surgery, radiation, chemotherapy or other mainstream interventions—and is alive today to share his remarkable story of faith and courage.

When Dr. Helvie, a longtime smoker, was diagnosed with lung cancer in 1974, it was practically a death sentence. After weighing his treatment options, the health professional made a radical, seemingly inane decision: To eschew orthodox medical practices in favor of a holistic, all-natural approach to treatment.

This July, Dr. Carl Helvie, RN, DrPH., celebrated his 80th birthday. The occasion would be a landmark birthday for any individual, but for Dr. Helvie, who was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer forty years ago and given only 6 months to live, it was particularly poignant. Astoundingly, he eradicated the disease naturally—without surgery, radiation, chemotherapy or other mainstream interventions—and is alive today to share his remarkable story of faith and courage.

When Dr. Helvie, a longtime smoker, was diagnosed with lung cancer in 1974, it was practically a death sentence. After weighing his treatment options, the health professional made a radical, seemingly inane decision: To eschew orthodox medical practices in favor of a holistic, all-natural approach to treatment.

 Dr. Carl Helvie is believed to be the world's oldest lung

 

There may have been some method to Dr. Helvie’s madness: According to Kim Dalzell, PHD, RD, LD, nutrition and lung cancer are inextricably linked. “Poor dietary habits, in addition to tobacco use, are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer," she says. "And, those foods and dietary practices that prevent cancer actively fight it or fuel it. So it just makes sense for long-term health to quit smoking and take a serious look at what else you are putting into your mouth.”

Source: uticaod.com

 

How to cure a cold or Flu in a couple of hours.

 Natural remedy for the general Cold or Flu

We know it and we all hate it. Mainly in the colder time of the year every second person walks around with a red nose, sniffing, snotting and a tired and exhausted expression on their face that tells you „I need to go to bed“.

The cold has struck again.

I am a person that gets an average of 2 colds per year, no matter what temperature it is outside, and like everyone I absolutely hate it.

Although I get it every year I notice it coming in advance, for me the symptoms are always the same and always come in the same order.

It starts of with slight scratchy feeling in the back of my throat which could easily be mistake for just a sore throat.

The night of that day is the worst one because the scratchy feeling gets worse and does not let you sleep as you keep have to swallow after each second breath.

The second day the scratching is very strong and is starting to add a little cough. At this time these two bastards call in for more symptoms like headache, a overall cold feeling and a general weakness.

Now the Cold has landed and is here to stay for at least 3 to 5 days. After day 3 the scratchy feeling has normally gone but has been replaced by a heavy cough, lots of snot and you simply feel shit.

Ideally we would all stay in bed drink a hot cup of tea with lemon and wait for our immune system to take care of the junk yard which our body has become.

If you are unlucky (like I used to be) you can not afford to stay in bed all day, which means you pump yourself up with tons of chemicals from your drug dealer/pharmacy.

Of course it seems to be the easiest solution right?

You Feel shit but you don't notice it any more right?

NO! Wrong!

I have now found the ultimate cure and prevention that will literally kill any Flu or cold within a couple of hours.

For the maximum efficiency of this method it is ideal to notice the cold coming as soon as possible or when cold time begins to take the necessary steps to prevent the cold from coming at all.

So here is the step by step Flu destruction method of the 21^st century.

Day 1:

The cold is starting its attack. You start to notice a scratching feeling in the back of your throat.

This is the area where the bacteria is spreading the fastest on your „palate“ and your „Tonsils“ (fig. 1)

Fig. 1

(Now normally your Tonsils are essential for fighting this kind of infection. The bad news is I must have been one of the last people that had their Tonsils take out, after it was recommended by a doctor to my parents. Thanks Doc.)

Now if you think you might as well disinfect your throat with a strong scotch whiskey and a hot chamomile tea, you think like I used to. The only thing is it doesn't reach the bacteria Hive on top of your palate.

So if we can not reach it through our mouth we have to either attack the cold internally (through our blood stream) or we go another way.

Now if you look at the picture again you will quickly notice, when I had tried this method for fighting the scratchy feeling in my throat, for the first time, I was thinking of another way to reach the top of the „Palate“ which is through the Nose.

I can tell you it is not necessarily a very pleasant feeling at the start but I would rather have that than feeling shit for the rest of the week.

Now the question that you must be thinking is „what are you planning on putting up your nose“?

To me the answer was quite easy. It must be a disinfectant and pathogen killer that absolutely eradicates anything that is attacking your system without creating damage to your nostrils.

The ultimate solutions was AMS theActivated Mineral Solution which we always have in our cupboard.

Now I have known this solution for many years and know how extremely powerful it is. Not only do people claim that they have healed all sorts of officially „UN-cureable“ diseases with it, but I for myself have had some amazing results with it. Although the general cold has always been the most difficult one.

Just quick, AMSis a two components mineral solution which release Chlorine Dioxide(the most powerful pathogen killer know to man)

So what I did is, I prepared a 3 drop solution in a small 60ml bottle. I waited the 30 seconds to let it activate and filled up the bottle with drinking water.

I gave it a nice swirl and slowly poured the solution down my right nostril. Again this is not necessarily pleasant but I desperately wanted to kill the cold before it dispersed throughout my body. I felt the activated AMS solution flowing down my nostril along the „inferior turbinate“ (fig 1). Whilst leaning my head back and having the mouth open to breath calmly, the solution went right down until I could feel it in the back of my mouth.

IMPORTANT: This is when you stop it and pull it into your mouth to spit it out or swallow it. You have to be careful other wise it runs into you airway and you choke.

As the solution had reached my mouth I spat it out and leaned my head forward to let the rest flow out of my nose again. 

 

Tip: If you tilt your head to one side when leaning your head forward the solution runs out the other nostril and that saves you doing the same procedure again for the other nostril.

Once the solution flew out of the nose I remain in that position for about 30 seconds and keep breathing through the mouth to let the solution kill all the bacteria, before snotting it out again.

After about two or three hours the scratching had gone completely and I could breathe through my nose better than ever before.

Now remember if you do this as soon as you can after feeling the scratch in your throat you can stop it that fast. If you let it continue until the next days it will take up to 2 days for the cold to be completely gone.

Now when I say completely gone I mean you feel as if you never ever had a cold, not like many people say „ yeah I got over my cold in 3 days as well“ while they snot into a tissue and cough.

If you have waited too long to do the nose wash I recommend additional steps that really help you get rid of the cold in no time.

First: If after 3 to 4 hours the scratchy feeling is still there repeat it. If it is really bad you might want to increase the AMS solution to 5 drops.

Second: Take Vitamin C! Now before you go and buy oranges, you need to take lots and lots of Vitamin C so it is wise to always have pure Vitamin C in powder form at home. You can use tablets as well but there are always additional substances included which do you no good.

Third: Drink shit lots of water. In school we are taught to drink a minimum of 2 litres a day. When I say drink shit lots, I mean like 4 or 5 litres! If you have trouble drinking so much, just keep a big bottle always beside you and whenever your thoughts drift off, drink!

A straw also helps to drink more. Just imagine it is beer then you will down it in no time.

Fourth: Hot water. Drink a hot tea and or hot water and drink it as long as it is still hot. Now Don't burn yourself but don't wait for the water to cool off before drinking it. Hot water is great for detoxification.

Five: Eat apples or drink Apple juice. Apples are also fantastic in helping the body transporting waste out of your system.

Six: Stop anything that support a infection this means:

• no sugar (sugary drinks, in coffee, in tea, sweats etc.)
• no Coffee ( I know this sounds hard but coffee is very acidic and that is poison for your system when you are fighting an intruder)
• no Smoking ( now I have seen plenty of idiots that smoke and keep smoking when having a cold, seriously how stupid must one be to smoke when having a cold)

Seven: Plenty of rest. Make sure you rest and sleep enough, apart from the 8 hours you need every night try and fit in a 20 minute power nap during the day. Ideally after taking your Vitamin C.

The second time I had tried this method I had frozen my ass off outside a Café because the inside was full and I had forgotten my jacket. I came home feeling absolutely shit with a scratchy feeling in my throat, weakness in my bones and also a pain in my back. I kept to the rules above did my Nose flush with 5 drops of activated AMS, took a spoon full of Vitamin C and had a 20 Minute Nap.

When I got up I felt like reborn. I was able to go out that night and had a great time with some friends not having to stay in bed.

So you see this is a absolute cold and flu killer. If always applied correctly and early enough you will never ever suffer from a cold again.

Obviously I can only talk for myself and from my own personal experience, but I am sure that a lot of people can relate to the symptoms that I described above and therefore the Method will work fine as well.

What is Tuberculosis and why Vitamin C kills TB

Vitamin C Kills Bacteria That Drugs Can’t

In a striking, unexpected discovery, researchers at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University NY/ USA have determined that vitamin C kills drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) bacteria in laboratory culture.

The study was published in the online journal Nature Communications.

What is Tuberculosis

TB is caused by infection with the bacterium M. that can spread through the lymph nodes and bloodstream to any organ in your body. It is most often found in the lungs. Most people who are exposed to TB never develop symptoms because the bacteria can live in an inactive form in the body. But if the immune system weakens, such as in people with HIV or elderly adults, TB bacteria can become active. In their active state, TB bacteria cause death of tissue in the organs they infect. Active TB disease can be fatal if left untreated.

In 2011, TB sickened some 8.7 million people and took some 1.4 million lives, according to the World Health Organization. Infections that fail to respond to TB drugs are a growing problem: About 650,000 people worldwide now have multi-drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), 9 percent of whom have extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB).TB is especially acute in low and middle income countries, which account for more than 95 percent of TB-related deaths, according to the World Health Organization .

Why Vitamin C kills Tuberculosis 

The Einstein discovery arose during research into how TB bacteria become resistant to isoniazid, a first-line TB drug. The lead investigator and senior author of the study was William Jacobs, Jr. Ph.D., professor of microbiology & immunology and of genetics at Einstein. Dr. Jacobs is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and a recently elected member of the National Academy of Sciences.

Dr. Jacobs and his colleagues observed that isoniazid-resistant TB bacteria were deficient in a molecule called mycothiol. “We hypothesized that TB bacteria that can’t make mycothiol might contain more cysteine, an amino acid,” said Dr. Jacobs. “So, we predicted that if we added isoniazid and cysteine to isoniazid-sensitive M. tuberculosis in culture, the bacteria would develop resistance. Instead, we ended up killing off the culture– something totally unexpected.”

The Einstein team suspected that cysteine was helping to kill TB bacteria by acting as a “reducing agent” that triggers the production of reactive oxygen species (sometimes called free radicals), which can damage DNA.

“To test this hypothesis, we repeated the experiment using isoniazid and a different reducing agent– vitamin C,” said Dr. Jacobs. “The combination of isoniazid and vitamin C sterilized the M. tuberculosis culture. We were then amazed to discover that vitamin C by itself not only sterilized the drug-susceptible TB, but also sterilized MDR-TB and XDR-TB strains.”

To justify testing vitamin C in a clinical trial, Dr. Jacobs needed to find the molecular mechanism by which vitamin C exerted its lethal effect. More research produced the answer: Vitamin C induced what is known as a Fenton reaction, causing iron to react with other molecules to create reactive oxygen species that kill the TB bacteria.

“We don’t know whether vitamin C will work in humans, but we now have a rational basis for doing a clinical trial,” said Dr. Jacobs. “It also helps that we know vitamin C is inexpensive, widely available and very safe to use. At the very least, this work shows us a new mechanism that we can exploit to attack TB.”

Source: www.activatedmineralsolution.com/

The ANSWER to Pain RELIEF

DMSO

(Dimethylsulfoxide)

-Natures Healer-

It makes pain dissapear just by Contact without waiting for Pills to work.

Just by rubbing it on !

In the case of a

pulled muscle, bruises

pains in Joints, ligaments and bones.

DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) proved to be a near-perfect solvent and transporter.

 Rub out pain on contact

 DMSO by-passes your digestive track and addresses your Pain at the Source.

 Packed with trillions of complex organic molecules, all working together in elegant synergy.

 It must be felt to be believed !

 

What exactly is DMSO?

DMSO is a well-known carrier substance used widely by doctors since 1955 as a way to carry medications directly into the skin.

1. Anti-inflammatory
2. Decongestant
3. Vasodilatory
4. Effective in the binding of toxic radicals

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has just celebrated ist 140th Birthday in the yea 2006.
In the Year 1866 the substance with the chemical formula (CH3)2SO has been synthsized the first time by the russian scientist Alexander Saytzeff, who has made his discovery public in a german Chemistry Journal. But only about one hundred years later the therapeutic use of this substance has been recognised. Actualy Dr. Stanley Jacob of the Oregon Health Sciences University was looking for a suitable preservative agent for Organs intended for transplantation, as one day he discovered that this clear, rotten and slightly garlic smelling fluid enters the skin very fast and deep. Jacob began to experiment – and soon discovered that he seemed to be dealing with a multi-purpose active ingredient.

The therapeutic band width of DMSO is in dead wide. This substance neutralises for example Hydroxyl radicals, one of the most frequent groups of cells damaging free radicals.
DMSO binds itself with the Hydroxyl Radicals and creates a chemical complex, which can be excreted by the Kidneys. The Substance also binds other free Radicals this way.

Furtheron DMSO increases the permeability of the Cell membranes and therefore makes it easier for the Cell to free itself from Toxicans. Even alergic reactions can me mildend with DMSO, which again relieves the immune system. DMSO furthermore shows effect on Scleroderma , Burnings, Inflammation and Pain conditions, Arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, paranasal sinuses infections, interstitial Cystitis, Herpes and Shingles, multiple sclerosis, systemic Lupus (SLE), sarcoidosis, Thyroiditis, Colitis ulcerosa, leprosy, cancer and other disease conditions.

Source: www.activatedmineralsolution.com